Back to blog
January 25, 2024
3 min read

Why Kafka is Not a Real Message Queue

Kafka is often compared to message queues, but it’s fundamentally different. Learn why and when to use Kafka.

Why Kafka is Not a Real Message Queue

Kafka is often compared to traditional message queues like RabbitMQ or ActiveMQ, but it’s fundamentally different. Let’s explore why.

What is Kafka?

Kafka is a distributed event streaming platform designed for:

  • High Throughput: Handle millions of events per second.
  • Durability: Store events for days, weeks, or indefinitely.
  • Replayability: Consumers can re-read events from any point in time.
Producer → Kafka (Topic) → Consumer(s)

How Kafka Differs from Message Queues

1. Message Retention

  • Message Queues:

    • Messages are removed once consumed.
    • Focus on transient communication.
  • Kafka:

    • Messages are retained for a configurable period.
    • Focus on durable event storage.
Message Queue:
Producer → Queue → Consumer (Message deleted)

Kafka:
Producer → Topic → Consumer (Message retained)

2. Consumer Model

  • Message Queues:

    • Push-based model.
    • Messages are delivered to consumers.
  • Kafka:

    • Pull-based model.
    • Consumers fetch messages at their own pace.

3. Message Ordering

  • Message Queues:

    • Ordering is not guaranteed.
  • Kafka:

    • Ordering is guaranteed within a partition.

4. Use Cases

  • Message Queues:

    • Task distribution, background jobs, RPC.
  • Kafka:

    • Event sourcing, stream processing, log aggregation.

When to Use Kafka

  1. Event Streaming:

    • Real-time data pipelines, analytics, and monitoring.
  2. Replayable Events:

    • Consumers can reprocess events for debugging or new features.
  3. High Throughput:

    • Handle millions of events per second.
  4. Distributed Systems:

    • Decouple producers and consumers in large-scale systems.

When Not to Use Kafka

  1. Simple Task Queues:

    • Use RabbitMQ or SQS for simple work distribution.
  2. Low Latency Requirements:

    • Kafka’s durability adds latency.
  3. Small Applications:

    • Kafka’s operational overhead is significant.

Example: Kafka vs RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ (Task Queue)

// Producer
rabbitTemplate.convertAndSend("task-queue", task);

// Consumer
@RabbitListener(queues = "task-queue")
public void handleTask(String task) {
    System.out.println("Processing task: " + task);
}

Kafka (Event Stream)

// Producer
kafkaTemplate.send("events", event);

// Consumer
@KafkaListener(topics = "events")
public void handleEvent(String event) {
    System.out.println("Processing event: " + event);
}

Challenges with Kafka

1. Operational Complexity

  • Requires Zookeeper (or KRaft in newer versions).
  • Managing partitions, brokers, and replication is non-trivial.

2. Message Duplication

  • Consumers may receive duplicate messages.
  • Implement idempotent processing.

3. Latency

  • Kafka prioritizes durability over low latency.

Bottom Line

  1. Kafka is not a traditional message queue—it’s an event streaming platform.
  2. Use Kafka for high-throughput, replayable, and distributed event processing.
  3. For simple task queues, stick to RabbitMQ or similar tools.

Remember: Kafka and message queues solve different problems. Choose the right tool for your use case.